Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The Defendant was boarding a victim B (71) taxi in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and has also been able to distribute the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government distribution dong, the destination of which is the destination.
On April 8, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 23:30 on the new distribution in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (b) on the road prior to the departure of the Gu, 3 times in the old distribution station, as the victim seems to have reduced the taxi fare of 15,00 won; (c) the victim refused to pay the taxi fee of 15,00 won; and (d) the victim was prevented from stopping at the taxi; and (e) the victim's chest part was 2 times in the victim's chest and 3-4 times in the hands.
2. Grounds for dismissing public prosecution;
(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act;
(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act.
(c) Grounds for dismissing a public prosecution: Subparagraph 6 of Article 327 of the Criminal Procedure Act (Agreement on September 8, 2016)