logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.03 2018나1864
구상금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. On February 24, 2017, around 10:25, 2017, the Plaintiff’s vehicle (A) discovered and stopped the Defendant’s vehicle entering five lanes from the combined section to five lanes, and caused a shocker to the right side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (No. 4, No. 1, No. 2, No. 4, and No. 5). In light of the fact that the Plaintiff’s vehicle, as a large cargo, did not have a large-scale vehicle operating on the front section to the front direction, it is reasonable to view the vehicle as a large cargo vehicle, and that the Plaintiff’s vehicle would not have any other operation of the vehicle to the front direction, and that the vehicle would not have any other operation of the vehicle to the front direction, and that the vehicle would not have any other operation of the vehicle to the front direction.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit.

arrow