logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원포항지원 2016.11.03 2016가합252
당선무효 등
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Relevant parties, etc. are the branches C of incorporated associations, which are the organizations of beauty artists established under Article 16 of the Public Health Control Act, and the plaintiff and D are the defendants' members, who were candidates for the 8th branch offices of the defendant.

B. On April 29, 2016, the Defendant held a general meeting of the 2016 general meeting at the F Hotel G center located in North-gu, Northern-gu, Seoul on April 29, 2016, and held a branch election at the same place (hereinafter “instant election”).

In the election of this case, D No. 1, and the Plaintiff paid 1,000,000 won of the candidate registration fee of 207, and D was elected as the head of the Defendant’s branch with D 135, Plaintiff 61, and invalid 11 votes by 207 electors.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 6, 8, Eul evidence 1 to 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. In the Plaintiff’s assertion, the election commission set up in the branch for the fair management of the election affairs, and the election commission and its members, despite the fact that the election commission and its members fairly manage the election affairs of this case, they conducted a prior election campaign for D in order to provide the electoral registry, receive documents for registration of candidates, deliver election campaign bulletins, etc. before the election campaign period as members of the election commission, which interfere with the Plaintiff’s election campaign, such as deletion of letters posted on the “C branch cosmetic” before the election campaign period. The Plaintiff violated the provisions such as preparation of ballot papers, restrictions on access to polling stations, voting clerks, etc. in the Defendant’s executive election regulations, and as a result, D was elected from the election of this case to the head of the branch office, the election of this case is invalid, and the Plaintiff, a competitor, a competitor.

arrow