logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.08.16 2018고합105
통신비밀보호법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and suspension of qualifications for one year.

However, the above imprisonment for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the Protection of Communications Secrets shall record, listen to or divulge any conversation between others that is not open to the public;

Nevertheless, at around August 5, 2017, the Defendant: (a) had a telephone conversation with D at the Defendant’s residence located in the window C of Changwon-si, Changwon-si; (b) had a misunderstanding that D’s telephone conversations with Defendant was terminated; (c) had a misunderstanding that D’s telephone conversations with Defendant was terminated; and (d) had a visual hearing and recording of D and E; and (c) transmitted the recorded conversation to E on August 10, 2017 and divulged it.

2. The Defendant of intimidation, around 11:00 on August 6, 2017, is at issue in which a conversation between the victim D and E is recorded, as described in the foregoing paragraph 1, and the victim calls for a telephone to know about the fact.

In addition to “”, from around that time to August 19, 2017, the victim threatened the victim on a total of seven occasions, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table.

3. On August 28, 2017, at around 14:00 on August 28, 2017, the Defendant obstructed defamation, assault, and business: (a) in G where an unspecified number of customers and employees work in F of Changwon-si, the Defendant: (b) “I am away from this Chewing year; (c) I am away from the president; and (d) I am well; (c)

Nice, upon filing a complaint, destroyed the drinking year, the gushee and winding of the president, and the Nice also destroyed the flag’s flag’s flag’s flag’s flag’s flag’s flag, flag’s flag’s flag, flag’s flag’s flag’s flag, and flag’s flag’s flag’s flag.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the victim, damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts, and obstructed the restaurant business of the victim by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of a defendant in part in the protocol of second public trial;

1. Each statement made by the witness D, H, I, and J in the second public trial records;

1. Statement of the police statement with D 1.

arrow