1. The Defendant: KRW 84,590,206 for the Plaintiff, and KRW 5% per annum from May 1, 2015 to October 13, 2017.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. In fact 1) B, around 16:10 on May 1, 2015, 2015, B is the Defendant vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

(ii) the G SPP car (hereinafter referred to as “victimd vehicle”) of F drivers, driving on a two-lane road in front of the Eg-glamping site in Hongcheon-gun D, Gangwon-do, to be a lusium lusium, driving on the two-lane road from the 3-distance lusium of F drivers.

) The part of the damaged vehicle, which was left left to turn to the left at the left-hand edge of the E-glamping site, was shocked by the front-hand side of the Defendant vehicle. The damaged vehicle caused the shock of the India vehicle and felled by approximately three meters below the upper-hand side of the Defendant vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”).

2) The Plaintiff, who was on board the top of the steering force of the victimized vehicle, suffered injury, such as the so-called “satisfying of the upper right dog” and “satisfying of the right frame” due to the instant accident.

3) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle. According to the fact of recognition of liability, the Defendant is liable for damages incurred by the Plaintiff due to the instant accident as the insurer of the Defendant’s vehicle. C. Determination on the Defendant’s claim for limitation of liability is asserted as follows: (a) The Defendant asserts that, while the Plaintiff was taking meals in the vicinity of the victimized vehicle and the Eglamping site and returned to the glamping site, the amount of damages caused by the instant accident should be reduced due to the Defendant’s joint negligence between the victimized vehicle and the driver of the damaged vehicle and the driver of the damaged vehicle.

The Plaintiff entered into a short-term contract with F as a franchise model, and visited the location of the instant accident by moving to the car owned by F in order to work as a model at the time of the instant accident, and was caused by the instant accident.

Therefore, F is a personal request from the plaintiff.