Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On November 14, 2019, around 02:10 on November 14, 2019, the Defendant was urged to stop the act of driving off and return home from C, the Gyeongak Police Station C, the 112 of which was dispatched after receiving a report, without any justifiable reason, while driving a door in front of the building located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

Accordingly, the Defendant, while taking a bath, such as “Cchchchopia,” “Cropopia,” “Cropopia,” “Cropia,” “Cropia,” and “Eropopia,” and “Cropism,” and “Cropism,” and “Cropism,” was sent once the back part of the instant D’s body in drinking.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of the lives and bodies of the police officers and the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Notice of attendance at the summary trial site;

1. An investigation report (a DNA camping by a police officer visiting a Dong police station for video verification);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (CCTV image analysis);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order has been sentenced to a fine due to assault, etc. The crime related to obstruction of performance of official duties is a crime that undermines the function of the State by nullifyinging the legitimate exercise of public authority, and thus, it is necessary to strictly punish the defendant to establish a national legal order and eradicate the light of the public authority. However, the defendant led to a confession of the crime in this case, his mistake is divided, the defendant committed the crime in this case by drinking, and the defendant committed the crime in this case by contingency under the influence of alcohol, and the degree of obstruction of official duties is presumed not to be serious.