Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 18:30 on June 2, 2019, the Defendant returned to the Defendant on the recommendation of the police officer who was dispatched on the ground that the victim D’s “E”, who is his/her business owner’s incidental parent, is a clerical error in D, and thus, it is clear that the victim’s “E” was a clerical error in D. As such, the Defendant recognized criminal facts. (B) The Defendant returned to the Defendant on the recommendation of the police officer who was dispatched on the ground that he/she did not receive an order on the ground that he/she took a large amount of drinking, such as (39 years of age) was taken, and the Defendant did not respond to the request of the victim that he/she would go to the request of the victim that he/she would go to the said restaurant, and then, at around 19:39 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the business of restaurant by force of the victim for about one hour, such as failing to go to other customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (limited to a police officer's bar campaign and video photograph of the site);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;