All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. Determination of each of the instant crimes is normal, in that the Defendant stolen money and valuables at a store where he/she had worked as his/her employee, and thereby harming trust between employer and workers beyond property damage, and the Defendant did not agree with the victims or take any particular measures to recover damage until the trial is trial. The Defendant committed each of the instant crimes without being sentenced to two years of imprisonment on January 22, 2015, and the Defendant was sentenced to two years of criminal punishment on April 18, 2016, and did not commit each of the instant crimes even during the period of repeated offense.

On the other hand, there are favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant properly recognizes and reflects his mistake, and the fact that part of the amount of damage was returned to the victim E.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading to the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too heavy or unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant and the prosecutor’s assertion are without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, since it is apparent that the “J” of the 16th half of the original judgment is a clerical error of “E”, it shall be corrected ex officio in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure.