logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.05.28 2015나103
업무상 사용경비금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff spent KRW 50,700,700 on March 8, 2012, and KRW 400,250 on August 11, 2012, in the course of external development of the project for the heading of Colombia for the Defendant Company. ② the expenses of KRW 277,400, and KRW 879,000 on February 2012, 2012 were not paid from the Defendant Company; ③ the expenses of KRW 65,000 on the daily exchange rate of KRW 110,00,00 on the exchange rate of KRW 110,00,00 on the other hand while the Defendant Company used the above vehicle for its business, and ④ the Defendant Company has the obligation to pay KRW 300,000,000 on the condition that it did not subscribe to the liability insurance policy of the said vehicle (= KRW 300,000,000, KRW 305,305,205,3005.

B. On December 10, 2013, the Suwon District Court 2013Kadan90316 case of objection filed by the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the conciliation was concluded on December 10, 2013, and there was a comprehensive liquidation clause at the time, so the Plaintiff’s request cannot be complied with.

2. According to the evidence No. 2: (a) on December 10, 2013, in the Suwon District Court case of claim No. 2013da90316, the Plaintiff and the Defendant: (b) on December 10, 2013, the Plaintiff and the Defendant confirmed that the Defendant had the obligation to pay KRW 946,90 with the settlement payment to the Plaintiff; and (c) on December 24, 2013, the Plaintiff and the Defendant paid the settlement payment to the Plaintiff by December 24, 2013. Upon receiving the said settlement payment, the Plaintiff and the Defendant confirmed that the Defendant did not have any obligation to the Plaintiff based on the judgment in Suwon District Court No. 2012Ga102434, Suwon District Court Decision No. 2012. The Plaintiff and the Defendant confirm that there is no mutual relationship with the Defendant in addition to this conciliation.

However, the claims sought by the Plaintiff in this case are all arising before the above protocol of mediation is prepared and are already included in the above protocol of mediation.

arrow