The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. On February 29, 2012, the Defendant, who was the president of the D Saemaul Depository, was the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts, on the ground that the victim’s J (the age of 42) is a general manager of the D Saemaul Depository, and the victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts in a society where 10 members, such as F, G, H, and auditor I, a director, in the second floor meeting room of D Saemaul Depository, located in E.

2. The court below's summary of the judgment below is acknowledged as follows: according to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the defendant made a statement to the effect that "The defendant did not know that "M was in in in imperious relationship with K by specifying the name of the victim J during the extraordinary board of directors meeting as stated in the facts charged, and that "M was in imperite relationship with K due to home mismatization, and due to this, M and L became in imperony relationship with K, and four children (3,000) were in mind. This day-off N was assaulted by KO apartment, and the K regular director tried to find the denying N, but failed to receive the statement." Since other executives present at the above meeting were not aware that "M was referred to the victim," it cannot be deemed that the victim was specified among the above executives, and it cannot be deemed that the defendant was not guilty of the circumstances that the defendant made a statement through the above executives present at the board of directors at the time, and that the defendant's statements were not related to the victim or the defendant's reputation relationship with the defendant.

3. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In full view of the contents and surrounding circumstances of the Defendant’s statements in a temporary society, a person involved in the Defendant’s statement or a person who knows with the victim and K.