logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2013.12.16 2013고정640
절도
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On June 21, 2012, the Defendant leased 20,000,000,000,000, monthly rent of 3,080,000 from C, Busan Shipping Daegu Do Officetel 49 (hereinafter “instant real estate”). On November 29, 2012, the Defendant: (a) on the part of the instant real estate, and (b) on the part of the director on the part of the instant real estate, 150,000,000,000 won of the market price of the instant real estate, and (c) cut off 1,50,000,000,000 won of TV, and 4,000,000,00

2. According to the evidence examined by the court below, the Defendant leased the instant real estate from C on June 21, 2012 and operated a gallon. The Defendant, upon C’s consent, transferred TV to another place for the reason that it was necessary to operate a gallon. The Defendant did not fully pay monthly rent and management expenses after the Defendant moved to the instant real estate. The Defendant demanded the Defendant to terminate the lease contract and withdraw the instant real estate on this ground. On November 29, 2012, the Defendant did not again install four barriers at the original location. At that time, the Defendant and C did not return the entrance and four keys of the entrance and the front door again to C, and there was a dispute over the issue of settlement of management fees and tax invoices. Since the Defendant, who was the lessee, should return the leased goods to the lessor after the termination of the lease, the Defendant could not be deemed to have returned the key to the lessor’s possession of the goods without permission, and there was no other dispute between the lessor and the Defendant.

3. Conclusion, this case.

arrow