The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

The summary of the facts charged in this case is as follows: (a) around 08:30 on March 25, 2013, the Defendant driven a Bsch Rexton car, and proceeds from the road in front of the restaurant in front of the Geumcheon-gu, Sucheon-gu, Sucheon-gu, Sucheon-si, the Defendant, at the time of leaving the house, to the room of the Geumcheon-do Office, was negligent in the course of business, from the left left the center line at the flood of the Geumcheon-gu, Geumcheon-do Office, the part on the bicycle right side of the victim C (the age of 91) driving of the victim C (the age of e.g., the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle to the upper part of the Defendant’s vehicle, thereby resulting in the victim’s divers of the flue

According to the legal statement, actual condition survey report, and photograph of the defendant and witness C, the accident of this case occurred in the course of crossing the road without bypassing it on the tri-do-Ying-Ying-Ying-Ying-Scheon-distance roads by the defendant's vehicle on the tri-Ying-Ying-Ting-Sing-Sing-Ting-Sing-Sing-Ting-Sing-Sing-Sing-Sing-Sing-To-Sing-Sing-do road. However, the defendant's vehicle was recognized as beyond the central part of the road on the tri-Sing-Sing-Sing-Sing-ging road. On the other hand, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence, not the road on which the victim proceeded, but the vehicle of the defendant does not exceed the central line installed on the Y-Ying-ging-ging-ging-ging-ging-ging-ging-ging-ging-ging-ging-ging road.

Therefore, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is only applicable to the facts charged in this case, and since the defendant's vehicle is recognized as being covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, it is subject to Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 327 (2) of the