Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 8, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of four months of imprisonment for embezzlement in the Incheon District Court Branch Branch of the Incheon District Court on April 8, 2017, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 16, 2017.

From March 2017, the Defendant was aware of the victim B through the Facebook from March 2017.

1. On April 13, 2017, the Defendant knew of the fact that he/she had interest in the women of Pyeongtaek victim C, the Defendant is running as if the victim could easily connect C with the victim at around 04:00 on April 13, 2017.

G. “G.” was false.

However, the defendant was thought to have received money from the injured party and used it individually.

The defendant was aware of the fact that 50,000 won is the same day as C's real estate brokerage expenses for the same day from the injured party.

D was remitted to a new bank account in the name of the bank.

2. On April 14, 2017, the Defendant called the victim at an infinite place on April 14, 2017, and sent KRW 200,000 as “C’s balance of real estate falls short of the outstanding amount.”

G. “G.” was false.

However, in fact, the defendant thought that he received money from the injured party to use the money individually, and there was no intention or ability to pay the cost of room-related expenses in lieu of C.

On April 14, 2017, at around 19:50 on April 14, 2017, the Defendant received 200,000 won from the damaged party to the account under the name of the National Bank in the name of the Defendant’s implied telecomp.

3. On April 16, 2017, the Defendant: (a) called the victim at an infinite location on April 16, 2017; and (b) took place as if the Defendant would make a drinking house in the Incheon Seodong-dong, and (c) took place as if the Defendant would bring the vehicle accident in question.

In contact with the complainant, it was false to lend money to the complainant, and to receive insurance proceeds from the loan of money because the vehicle accident occurs.

However, there is no enemy who suffered an accident.