logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 영월지원 2016.04.07 2016고합1
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복상해등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 18, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul Central District Court on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and completed the execution of the sentence at the original prison on October 23, 2015.

1. On December 20, 2015, the Defendant, at the main point of “E” operated by the victim D, who is in Thai City C, on December 20, 2015, expressed the attitude that the Defendant would normally pay the amount even if the Defendant did not own cash or a able credit card, etc. and received the payment from the injured party, even if he did not have a alcohol or a share, and ordered the injured party to pay the amount in a normal manner.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, was provided with alcohol and alcohol equivalent to KRW 172,00 from the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On December 31, 2013, the Defendant was indicted of any suspicion of retaliation against the Victim F (FF) on or around December 31, 2013; on July 18, 2014, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced the Defendant to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Intimidation, etc.) at the Seoul Central District Court on or around July 18, 2014, and was punished due to a report by the victim.

I thought that they would be retaliationed and thoughted.

On December 21, 2015, the Defendant had resided in the “H” restaurant operated by the injured party in Thai City G on December 21, 2015, and in the “H” restaurant operated by the injured party in Thai City on December 20:45.

There has been retaliation against it.

".................... (b) assaulted the victim's head debt by taking the victim's head debt.

As a result, the Defendant assaulted the victim with the purpose of retaliation against the provision of the proviso of investigation in connection with his criminal case investigation and trial.

3. The Defendant who damages property is equivalent to KRW 360,00 of the market price, which is the victim’s possession, by cutting off the cell phone cited by the victim on the floor of the restaurant on the ground that the victim reported to the police at the time and place set forth in paragraph 2.

arrow