logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.08.25 2016고정1259
근로기준법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged is an individual entrepreneur who runs a construction business with eight full-time workers.

The Defendant did not pay KRW 6,05,00,00 in total amount of wages of Category C, 6,050,000, D’s wages of KRW 9,350,000, E’s wages of KRW 5,440,000, and F’s wages of KRW 4,250,000,00, which worked from September 1, 2015 to October 31 of the same year at the Jeju apartment construction site, within 14 days from the date of retirement without any agreement between the parties on the extension of payment period.

However, on April 2016, the above workers explicitly expressed their intention that they do not want to punish the defendant.

- Dismissal judgment (Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act, Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Litigation Act)

arrow