A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 31, 2016, the Defendant, at around 18:23, 2016, committed a dispute with security guards of Seongbuk-gu Seoul apartment complex C, 308-7, with the 7th floor of Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, and thereby interfered with police officers’ public order and security and legitimate performance of duties related to reporting duties, by assaulting the Defendant’s son and son, who was working for the Seoul Seongbuk-gu Police Station D’s seat, to whom the Defendant had his house located, to “the son son son son son son son son son son.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of the recommended sentence] There is no person [the person who has been subject to a special sentencing] in the basic area (from June to one year and four months) (the person who has been subject to a special sentencing] [the decision of sentencing] the defendant has a record of being punished for the same kind of crime, and the fact that a mistake is recognized and reflected, etc., shall be determined by taking into account the matters prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act.