logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.06.08 2016고단28
강제추행
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 15, 2015, around 12:30 on November 15, 2015, the Defendant was involved in an indecent act against the victim F (5 years old) who was in a past relationship within the Defendant’s E-vehicle in the 1st floor of the D Public Health Center located in Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and once again, due to the refund of the house’s key money living together with the victim, in civil litigation, the Defendant was involved in an indecent act while living together with the victim.

In other words, whether the defendant "I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I am well."

The term "in the vehicle" refers to "after the head of the tide where the victim was seated in the vehicle, the victim's panty, forced the victim's panty, forced the defendant's panty, and forced the victim to leave the hand in the panty of the victim, and forced the victim to leave the panty.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against the F;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Recording CDs [F] consistently committed an indecent act, such as the statement of facts constituting a crime, from an investigative agency to the court;

A statement is made by the victim. ① A victim made an answer to the purport that he forced the defendant to display the phone immediately after he saw the defendant on the date and time of criminal facts, and the defendant made an answer to this effect that “the defendant was forced to call and correct the mind.” This is deemed to have been due to the fact that the defendant forced the victim, and it is not deemed that the victim's speech was erroneously discovered as alleged by the defendant, and that the victim does not seem to have responded to the victim's speech as alleged by the defendant. ② The victim was not a part of the victim's phone recording to the defendant.

Whether a certified judicial scrivener has been admitted or not;

“The Defendant was asked to the effect that the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim, even in light of the victim’s questions, etc., in a case where the Defendant was recorded in the black box installed on the vehicle.

arrow