beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,500,000 to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on July 1, 2008, with a penalty of KRW 1,500,000 for the same year.
9. On November 18 of the same year, the Daegu District Court issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for the same offense, and issued a summary order of KRW 5 million for the same offense at the Daegu District Court on November 18 of the same year, and on September 26, 2013, the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 5, 2013 upon being sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the same offense at the Daegu District Court on September 26, 2013.
[Criminal Facts]
1. On November 9, 2013, the Defendant did not obtain a driver’s license, while under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of 0.095%, the Defendant driven a Clater’s car in an unclaimed section in accordance with the first lane of the said road as the front flow-distance outflow from the front flow-distance bank at the lower flow-distance bank at the lower flow-distance bank in Daegu-gu, Daegu on November 21, 2013.
2. A motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance for violating the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall not be operated on the road, but the defendant operated a franchise motor vehicle as stated in paragraph 1, which is not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph 1.
3. The Defendant, at the time specified in Paragraph 1, was required to make a drinking test and present identification card from the Daegu Southern Police Station Traffic Survey Assistant D, the Daegu Southern Police Station, which called the Defendant’s official document issued to E with the driver’s license, and requested the above police officer to sign the driver’s signature on the driver’s signature column of the report on the driver’s standing statement and the report on the detection of the driver’s identity, on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant’s unlawful uttering of official document; (b) the Defendant presented the driver’s license, which is an official document issued to E; and (c) the Defendant continued to do so.