logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.11.02 2017고단1844
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle of less than C3 tons owned by the agricultural company B.

On February 8, 2017, the Defendant was driving a vehicle above 01:00, and completed the work on the upper part of the B factory located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun.

Since there are many people's places, the defendant engaged in driving service with the duty of care to make the back-up signal in advance and to accurately manipulate the back-up and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the safe operation of the steering and the system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not discover the victim E (50 years) who was in the aftermath of the time, and did not discover the victim E (50 years) who was in the aftermath of the time, and suffered injury, such as a ductal between the left pelle and the left pelle of the above for about 10 weeks of treatment.

Judgment

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: The main sentence of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;

(c) Declaration of non-existence of punishment after prosecution: Submission of a written agreement containing the intent that the victim E is not subject to punishment;

(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow