logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.02.08 2017가단324789
손해배상(자)
Text

1. As to Plaintiff A’s KRW 7,095,380, and KRW 500,000 and each of the said money, the Defendant shall start from January 30, 2017 to February 3, 2018.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On January 30, 2017, at around 06:15, C driven a Dbeer or car (hereinafter “diver vehicle”) and got injured by the Plaintiff, i.e., the front part of the vegetable vehicle, which was crossinged from the front part of the vegetable apartment in front of the vegetable apartment in front of the vegetable apartment in front of the vegetable apartment in Busan East-gu, where the vegetable apartment in front of the vegetable apartment in front of the vegetable apartment in front of the vegetable apartment in front of the vegetable apartment in front of the vegetable apartment in front of the vege-gu, Busan.

(hereinafter “instant traffic accident”). (b)

Plaintiff

B is the husband of the Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is an insurance company that entered into a comprehensive insurance contract with respect to a household vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence No. 2 and video (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the above recognition of liability and the evidence mentioned above, the traffic accident of this case is deemed to have occurred as a result of the mistake in driving a sea-going vehicle without temporarily stopping, even though a pedestrian is crossing at the crosswalk without signal lights. Thus, the defendant is an insurer of a sea-going vehicle and is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the traffic accident of this case, unless there are special circumstances.

B. The defendant asserts that the responsibility of the defendant should be partially limited in light of the situation that the accident place is a crosswalk with no signal, etc. and the damaged vehicle was driven at the time of the accident. However, the defendant's allegation in this part is not acceptable, since it is difficult to recognize that there was any error in the occurrence of the traffic accident in this case to the

3. The computation of the present price at the time of the accident of the scope of damages liability shall be based on the method of deducting intermediate interest at the rate of 5/12 per month.

b.the Parties;

arrow