beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is the owner of B cargo vehicle (hereinafter “the Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement with the owner of C cargo vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) on the Defendant vehicle.
B. On April 29, 2011, the Plaintiff was driving the instant Plaintiff’s vehicle, and was proceeding from the area to the area to the area from the area to the area to which the intersection was located in front of the mountain of the mountain of Gyeyang-dong in Gangseo-gu in Busan, Gangseo-gu, Busan. On April 29, 201, the Plaintiff shocked the instant Defendant’s vehicle of the D Driving, which was left left to the left at the area to the area to which the said intersection was located near the said intersection.
(hereinafter “instant accident”).
C. The Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Embry area located in Busan, from April 30, 201 to May 5, 2011 due to the instant accident. D. The Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Embry area located in Busan, as a result of the instant accident.
On the other hand, D was placed under investigation as a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, but was subject to disposition on January 3, 2012 (No. 201-No. 53676 of the Busan District Prosecutors' Office).
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 3, 4 evidence, Eul 1 to 4 evidence (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The plaintiff asserts that since the accident of this case occurred by shocking the plaintiff's vehicle that D violated the signal and kept left by negligence and caused the accident of this case, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the sum of KRW 16,500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won due to the accident of this case. The defendant asserts that the accident of this case occurred from
3. According to the overall purport of each of the above evidence and arguments, ① the signal system at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at issue, the signal system at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at both sides of the lux and