logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.07.22 2020고단2087
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

When the defendant does not pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be converted into one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 25, 2016, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a fine of KRW 4 million for the same crime in the same court on April 28, 2016.

피고인은 2020. 2. 15. 02:11경 인천 부평구 B아파트 앞 도로에서 C 그랜저 승용차 시동을 켠 채 정차하던 중, 112신고를 받고 출동한 인천삼산경찰서 D지구대 소속 경장 E, 경장 F, 경위 G로부터, 피고인에게 술 냄새가 나고, 걸음걸이가 비틀거리고, 눈이 충혈 된 등 술에 취한 상태에서 자동차를 운전하였다고 인정할 만한 상당한 이유가 있어 같은 날 02:16경부터 02:26경까지 약 10분간 3회에 걸쳐 5분 간격으로 음주측정기에 입김을 불어 넣는 방법으로 음주측정에 응할 것을 요구받았다.

Nevertheless, the defendant refused this and did not comply with a police officer's request for a drinking test without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Previous records: Criminal records and other inquiries, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the confirmation of criminal records for the same kind of crime;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (2) and (1), and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act [Selection of a fine by taking into account the circumstances without the same criminal records, etc., in addition to summary orders twice in the case of violation of the Road Traffic Act of 2016 as seen earlier by the defendant];

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow