The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence (two million won in penalty) that the court below rendered by the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The instant crime is a crime that provides an important means of crime to the so-called “Singing,” which is closely planned and organized against many unspecified persons. Considering that the social harm caused by the “Sing,” crime is very serious, it is necessary to strictly punish the act of transferring the access medium. The instant access medium is actually used for the “Sing,” and the fact that the instant access medium is actually used for the “Sing.”

However, considering the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is deeply divided; (b) there is no record of criminal punishment; (c) the number of transferred access media; and (d) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment; and the motive, means and consequence of the instant crime; and (c) the circumstances after the instant crime were committed, the lower court’s punishment is too uneasible and unfair.

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.