logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.06.03 2013고정4806
상해
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of one million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of five hundred thousand won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the people living in Jung-gu, Seoul, E apartment 25 Dong 607, and Defendant A living in the same apartment 507.

1. On June 19, 2013, Defendant B: (a) around 17:30 on June 19, 2013, the Defendant was placed in a trial room as a matter of inter-floor noise around the said apartment building 25-dong; and (b) pushed the victim’s chests of the victim A (the age of 67 years) with his hand, and put the victim into a scarcity, with approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Defendant A inflicted bodily injury on the victim B (the 42-year old-age)’s chest on the same date, time, and at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1), on two occasions, and on six occasions, Defendant A suffered bodily injury, i.e., the victim’s cage cages, which require approximately four weeks of treatment due to an outbreak.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness B and A;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against B and A;

1. Each police statement made to B and A;

1. Each complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Defendants: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Selection of fines

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (Amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014)

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendant A and their defense counsel held that the above victim was pushed down to defend the victim’s attack against the victim’s attack, and Defendant A and their defense counsel asserted that each of the Defendant’s acts constitutes a legitimate act, and the illegality of each of the Defendant’s acts constitutes a legitimate act. However, according to the evidence of the judgment, it is recognized that the Defendants committed the same harmful act as the facts charged against each of the two parties at sight and at sight, and that the Defendants committed the same act as the facts charged, in light of the motive, circumstance, and attitude of the fighting, etc., the victim’s legal interests.

arrow