beta
Text
1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s main claim is dismissed.
2. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) is the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff) 615,850.
Reasons
(a)be paid damages for delay by appropriating the total contract amount / the amount to be paid;
(4) The place of delivery is the factory of the defendant's head office. Article 5 (Guarantee Obligation) The plaintiff guarantees that the machinery of this case has the performance as salvb and completes trial operation after delivery under Article 3, and bears the duty to prove performance. Article 6 [Liability for Repair] The plaintiff guarantees the quality and performance of the machinery of this case for 3 years against the defendant, and is obliged to repair for any natural trouble that is not due to the negligence on the part of the defendant. The defects arising from the care of the defendant shall be paid free of charge. The defects arising from the care of the defendant shall be kept at 20/1,000 of the total contract amount (the warranty bond may be substituted by the guarantee bond).
(i) Article 9 (Matters under special agreement);
3. Detailed pricing specifications and specifications shall be added separately.
[Detailed Value Statement] 13 Borrowing and Lending 800*1200*1500 SET 30 2,248,626 67,458,000
C. The Defendant was scheduled to receive support from port ports in relation to the establishment of a factory, and required to submit a tax invoice for the instant machinery for this purpose. However, as the Plaintiff was unable to issue a tax invoice due to tax in arrears, the Plaintiff agreed to pay the tax in arrears on behalf of the Defendant, and on December 2, 2015, the Defendant paid the tax in arrears by the Plaintiff to the North Daegu District Tax Office on behalf of the Plaintiff on December 2, 2015.
1. Based on the instant contract concluded on September 25, 2014, the first installment was completed on December 2015, based on which the Defendant paid all payments as the Plaintiff.
However, I request additional installation and modification installation as it is inappropriate for the production of manufactured products.
2. All the costs incurred in installing any addition and modification will be borne by the Plaintiff, and all additional installation and modification installation will be completed by April 20, 2016.
3. April 20, 2016