The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The fact that the defendant's judgment on the unfair argument of sentencing has reached this court and all of the crimes that were denied by the original court are reflected is favorable to the defendant that has changed in this court.

However, the Defendant, in collaboration with B, threatened the victim H on the ground that the victim did not reach an agreement, and the Defendant was arrested as a result, followed by the arrest and the disturbance at the police station.

In addition, in one singing practice place, there was an injury to the victim L who is the main issue with the drinking value and damaged the goods owned by the victim.

In this context, considering the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he committed the crime of this case even though he was in office for the same crime, it is necessary to severely punish the defendant

In light of the above circumstances, considering that the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc. are gathered, as seen earlier, and all of the factors favorable to the Defendant among the various factors of sentencing, the lower court’s sentencing (one year of imprisonment, a fine of KRW 300,000) cannot be deemed to be so excessive that it would be reversed.

The defendant's assertion disputing this is not accepted.

2. Conclusion, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed for lack of grounds.