logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.09.30 2016고단811
사기
Text

There are two types of frauds: Nos. 1 to 32 of the list of crimes in the attached Table 1 of the judgment of the defendant, and Nos. 2 of the list of crimes.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 2, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Western District Court (Seoul Western District Court) and the above judgment became final and conclusive on November 28, 2015.

On July 2014, when the defendant 2016 was in trial due to fraud, he was absent from the court and was living for the escape of the defendant. On October 2015, 2015, he became aware of the victim C through smartphone-rating application.

The defendant introduced himself to the victim as a business person, thereby trying to obtain money necessary for the escape of the victim from the victim, by deceiving him to the victim as a business person.

On October 20, 2015, the Defendant called the victim at a place where it is impossible to know the place on October 20, 2015, and “It is difficult to finance by suffering 5 billion won fake fraud. However, all things will be resolved within two months.

On the 1st day of the following month, it was false that money may be repaid on a two-day basis if money is entered from a department store.

However, the defendant did not have been damaged by the fraud of KRW 5 billion, and did not operate the company that imports the stolen, and even if he did not borrow money from the damaged party due to no income during the escape, he did not have any intent or ability to complete the payment.

As above, the Defendant: (a) received 6 million won from the injured party to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of E on the same day from the injured party; and (b) received 82,729,540 won in total over 39 times from December 2, 2015, as shown in the List 1 of the Crimes List 2015.

On July 2014, 2014, when the defendant was under trial due to fraud, he had been absent from the trial and had been living for the escape. On June 2015, 2015, he became aware of the victim F through smartphone-rating display.

The defendant introduces himself as a business person to the victim, thereby acquiring the money necessary for the escape of the victim from the victim's death to the victim.

arrow