The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

G of the gist of the grounds for appeal and H are deemed to have failed to view that the defendant did not assault the victim in the original trial.

The judgment below reversed the statement on the facts of assault at the court below, and the defendant was found guilty of the facts of assault at the court below, and the judgment below is erroneous in the misunderstanding of facts. The judgment below is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts. The judgment below is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Judgment

A. Based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, the lower court determined that the Defendant sufficiently recognized the facts of assault, such as: (a) the Defendant, based on the date and time stated in the facts charged; and (b) the Defendant’s officers and vision attached to the representatives of occupants in connection with the project to replace an elevator at the site; (c) the victim E face, the chairperson of the occupants’ representative meeting

In view of the facts charged of this case, the charges of this case were convicted.

B. The evidence duly adopted and examined by the original court and the court of the first instance on the determination of the party, in light of the following circumstances recognized by each legal statement of E, M, and F, the defendant can sufficiently recognize the fact of assaulting the victim at the time and place stated in the facts charged in the instant case.

If there are such circumstances, the judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and there are no errors in the misapprehension of facts as alleged by the defendant, and the defendant's assertion is without merit.

① The victim was at the investigative agency up to the trial court of the first instance. “The victim was holding a representative meeting because of elevator repair cases,” but the Defendant returned to the lower chair who was seated in the seat of the president, and she got to the lower end, and she got to the lower end, and she was the principal offender, and the Defendant was on the spot.