1. As to the Plaintiff KRW 9,00,000 and its KRW 6,000 among them, the Defendant shall start on March 19, 2010, and the remainder 3,000.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff delegated the following three representation affairs from the Defendant.

(2) On March 2010, respectively, the Seoul Northern District Court 2017Da1795 decided April 3, 2010:

In the course of the litigation of this case, ① the defendant, a member of the partnership B (hereinafter referred to as the “non-party partnership”), who is the case in question, tried to hold an extraordinary general meeting as the representative of the proposing party, and the non-party partnership filed an application against the defendant for a provisional disposition prohibiting holding the said extraordinary general meeting. The plaintiff represented the defendant with the law firm preference, and the Seoul Northern District Court dismissed the above provisional disposition application of the non-party partnership on March 19, 2010.

C. ② During the proceedings of the instant case, the instant case: (a) is an administrative litigation seeking confirmation of invalidity of a disposition of authorization to establish a non-party partnership against the head of Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the competent administrative agency at the time of the application for authorization to establish a non-party partnership; (b) the Plaintiff conducted the said administrative litigation on behalf of the Defendant on the ground that there is a serious and apparent defect in the written consent to establish the association or the articles of association submitted at the

D. (3) The defendant filed an application with the Seoul Northern District Court 2010Kahap580 for provisional disposition suspending the effect of the resolution of the Seoul Northern District Court 2010Kahap580 with other members of the non-party union. The above court accepted the application and accepted the provisional disposition on July 12, 2010, and the non-party union appealed against the same court.