logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2015.05.13 2015고정68
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at early January 2012, 2012, expressed his mind to acquire property profits by using credit cards, etc. of the victim by using the victim’s trust relationship with the victim, as the victim B (the 35 years of age, and the 35 years of age) came to know through the Internet hosting site and from March 2012.

1. In March 2012, the Defendant using a credit card made a false statement to the victim of D’s dormitory located in the Gyeongjin-gun, Ulsan-gun, Gyeongjin-gun, the Defendant: “The Defendant could not make a credit card by using a credit card in the current bad credit holder due to an error of credit guarantee; the Defendant purchased a vehicle at a premium rate on the side of the vehicle and paid the installment.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the purchase price even if he purchases a motor vehicle in installments.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received Samsung Card on the same day, purchased Fchip X-G car in the amount of KRW 4,900,000 from E located at Port on the 24th of the same month.

In addition, from around that time to May 9, 2012, the Defendant purchased an article equivalent to KRW 7,871,844 on a total of 46 occasions using the Samsung Card in the name of the victim, and did not repay the price, and acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to that amount.

2. On April 23, 2012, the Defendant defrauded the mobile phone price and the user fee by fraud to the victim at the mobile phone sales store in the Yellow-si, Yellow-si, Yellow-si, Seoul, that “A mobile phone charge would be changed in the name of the victim within three months after paying the face value by opening the mobile phone.”

However, even if the defendant opens a mobile phone, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the cost of the mobile phone and the cost of the mobile phone.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received one set of gallonization on the same day from the victim, and the sum of the mobile phone prices and charges to the victim 1,648.

arrow