Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[2014 high-level 1190] On August 5, 2013, the Defendant: (a) invadedd the heat door within Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building; and (b) stolen the hacksaw and the hacks by using the hacks and hacks together with four taps of the water owned by the victim C, which are installed within the building using the hacks.

[2014 High Court Decision 1191]

1. On June 14, 2013, around 14:00, the Defendant confirmed that the said cargo was not corrected, and that the said cargo was not corrected near the E-Poter owned by the victim D, which was parked in front of the 813-31, Geumcheon-gu, Geumcheon-gu, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, the Defendant continued to open a chief door and take out the construction tools equivalent to KRW 190,000 in the market price owned by the victim located in the said cargo vehicle.

2. On July 6, 2013, around 08:02, the Defendant carried a victim D-owned bridge equivalent to 100,000 won at the market price owned by the victim D, which was located in the E-owned cargo in the same manner as the above paragraph (1).

3. At around 16:40 on July 8, 2013, the Defendant, at the same place as above 16:40, carried out a pipe 3 roll and electric wires in an aggregate amounting to 200,000 won in the market price owned by the victim D, which was placed in E-wit cargo in the same manner as above 20,000 won.

4. On July 22, 2013, at around 05:17, the Defendant: (a) carried the victim D’s trucking freight in the same manner in the same manner as the above paragraph 1; (b) carried the pipe 3 rolls and electric wires at a total amount of KRW 200,000 in the market price owned by the victim D.

5. On July 26, 2013, around 06:52, the Defendant: (a) carried a pipe 2 rolling the victim D’s market price equivalent to KRW 50,000, located in the E Poter cargo in the same manner and in the same manner as the above paragraph (1).

Accordingly, the Defendant stolen the property amounting to the total of 740,000 won in the market price owned by the victim D over five times.

Summary of Evidence

[2014 High Court Decision 1190]

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Police seizure protocol (2014 high-level 1191);

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each protocol of police statement concerning D;

1. Criminal facts;