1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 39,643,635 against the Plaintiff and its related thereto, from October 28, 2014 to April 20, 2016.

1. The court's explanation on this part of the facts of recognition is the same as the statement on the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this part is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the facts charged as above and the evidence revealed, the fire in this case appears to have been emitted due to electrical factors. On the left side of the above simplified warehouse, which is the place where the fire in this case occurred, there were no other equipment using electricity except the air to supply all the air to the air conditioners installed by the defendant. There was no inflammable substance in the above simplified warehouse or in the vicinity of the air conditioners. At the time of the fire in this case, at the time of the fire in this case, the fire in this case occurred, or there was a fire in the upper part of the air condition of the air conditioners and cooling stations, and a large number of shock tracess were discovered from the electric wires supplied with all the above electricity, and the electric wires supplied to the air conditioners and air conditioners are exposed to outside, so it is difficult to view that the fire in this case was not properly maintained and supplied by the air conditioners and air conditioners owned by the defendant.

Therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff who subrogatedly acquired the right to claim damages against the defendant of E by paying insurance money to the defendant of E for the damages caused by the fire of this case.

B. The following circumstances, which are acknowledged by comprehensively considering the evidence mentioned prior to the scope of liability for damages and the fact-finding results on the Seoul Western Vice-Governor of the Korea Electrical Safety Corporation, are established between the simple warehouse and the two stores to prevent the spread of damage even if the operator of the two stores of this case became aware of the occurrence of a fire early and notified the Defendant of the occurrence of the fire.