Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C observer car.

On July 9, 2017, around 17:50, the Defendant continued the front road in front of the Yansan-gu D in the front of the Yansan-si, the front of which was in front of the Fansan-si, into the front section of the Fan-si fire station located in the front section of the Fan-si. At that time, a crosswalk was installed without signal lights at the front section.

In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by properly operating the traffic laws and regulations, and by accurately operating the steering gear, steering gear, and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant’s failure to perform such duty of care, thereby finding the Victim F (F, 70 years of age) who dried the above crosswalk late, was negligent in the course of business, and suffered injury to the victim due to the shock of the said car by taking the victim into consideration about two weeks of medical treatment, and the victim did not immediately stop and immediately stop so and failed to take necessary measures such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Reports on internal investigation (specific relation to the suspect);

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (the point of escape after the injury caused by occupational negligence) of the relevant Act;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was agreed with the victim and the vehicle for the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) is covered by a comprehensive insurance, and there is no criminal record against the defendant. On the other hand, the defendant, even though he escaped with the victim's injury, she was set up at the site of the accident even though she got back to the site of the accident even though she got back to the site of the accident at the request of the witness who concealed the defendant, and the defendant escaped.