logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.12.19 2014나24928
부당이득금반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the member of the party who cited the judgment of the court of first instance states concerning this case are as follows: “The representative director of the defendant is registered as the representative director”; “It is difficult to view that the defendant is liable for the aiding and abetting” in Part 20; and “It is difficult to view that the defendant is liable for the aiding and abetting” in Part 20 as “It is difficult to view that he/she is liable for the aiding and abetting or joint tort (In light of the evidence No. 2, according to the records of evidence No. 2, it is recognized that the defendant investigated D on suspicion of fraud in relation to the act of giving the certificate of personal seal impression, etc., but it is recognized that the defendant was issued a non-guilty disposition against the defendant on May 27, 2013).” This cited it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. As such, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow