beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s disposition of determining a disability grade against the Plaintiff on July 28, 2017 is revoked.
2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff suffered from an occupational accident that occurred on December 5, 2014, the Plaintiff: “The 4th Emphical frame, fluoral hemosis, fluoral fluoral tymosis, fluoral fluoral tymosis, fluoral fluoralone, fluoral fluoralone on the right side, fluoralone of the upper left side, fluoral fluoralsium of the upper left side, fluoralsium of the upper left side, fluoral fluoralsium of the upper left side, fluoralsium of the upper left side, fluoral flusium of the upper right side, fluoral fluoral fluor, 11, 12, 12, fluoral flusium, fluoral fluoral flusium, 71,17.
B. After completing medical care as above, the Plaintiff filed a claim for disability benefits with the Defendant on July 28, 2017, along with restrictions on and pains of both sides. On July 28, 2017, the Defendant rendered a decision that the Plaintiff’s disability grade constitutes class 8 (hereinafter “instant disposition”), and paid KRW 57,464,350 to the Plaintiff’s lump-sum disability compensation payment around the above time.
Social disability of class 8 (A in the fixed condition of 1,00 post-1, 2, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of class 14 (in the case of a person who remains injured by extreme functional disorder on his/her moving-in) : A class 2 of class 8 (in the case of a person who remains injured by extreme disorder on his/her moving-in due to the fixed condition of the 1,000 post-1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the evidence of class 1, the fact that there is no dispute over the ground for recognition of class 8 of class 8 (in the case of a person who remains injured by his/her falling short of the standard), the fact that there is no dispute over the ground for recognition of class 1, 2, 5
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
(a) The details of the relevant statutes are as shown in the attached statutes;
B. Article 46(5) of the Enforcement Rule of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Enforcement Rule of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act”) on the basis of determination of the grade of disability 1 shall be construed as either: