logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2020.05.07 2019노554
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(알선영업행위등)방조등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal: The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is that the defendant assisted and aided the act of arranging child or juvenile sexual traffic by introducing children or juveniles to sexual traffic brokers, transferred the means of access to others, and acquired pecuniary benefits by using the means of access to others' wired chips and making mobile phone small payment.

The lower court determined the Defendant by taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the act of arranging child and juvenile sex trafficking harms the morality of our society on the sex culture; (b) the act of arranging child and juvenile sex trafficking brings about serious harm to the body, character, and spirit of the child and juvenile; and (c) the illegal nature of the act is very high; (d) the Defendant introduced a juvenile from home to a commercial sex broker and was not directly involved in the act of arranging sex trafficking itself; and (e) the Defendant cannot be deemed liable to take part of the cost of sexual trafficking; (b) the crime committed again despite the fact that the Defendant was sentenced to suspension of indictment or criminal punishment for the same or similar crime in the case of the violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and the crime of fraud using a computer, etc.: (c) the Defendant recognized all of the crimes; (d) the period of arranging sex trafficking is relatively relatively long; (e) the commission of sex trafficking was agreed with the victim; and (e) the equity between the judgment and the concurrent crimes in the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act are determined.

The sentencing of the lower court appears to have been determined appropriately by fully taking into account the above various circumstances, and there is no special change in circumstances to be assessed differently from the sentencing conditions of the lower court until the trial is held.

Defendant

The defendant's defense counsel is about sentencing.

arrow