The Pakistan shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15 million, and the defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

Defendant

A above.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a director of the company B in the Gyeonggi City, and the defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of aggregate Do and retail business.

1. A person who intends to engage in development activities, such as changing the form and quality of land of the defendant A, shall obtain permission from the competent authority;

Nevertheless, without obtaining permission for development activities on January 2017, the Defendant changed the form and quality by raising soil at least 2 meters on a site equivalent to 11,156 square meters of land for G, H, I, and J in Gyeonggi-si and four parcels (G, H, I, and J).

2. Defendant B’s inside director A committed the above offense in relation to the Defendant’s business at the date, time, and place specified in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement made to K in the police statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the written accusation;

1. Article 140 subparagraph 1 of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act, and Article 56 subparagraph 2 of the same Act, and Article 146 subparagraph 1 of the same Act, and Article 56 subparagraph 2 of the same Act, and Article 143, Article 140 subparagraph 1 of the same Act, and Article 56 (1) of the same Act, in cases of a defendant who is selected as a fine;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse (Defendant A);

1. It appears that the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not have the record of the same kind of crime against Defendant A for the reason of sentencing of the provisional payment order, and that the present restitution is not made, but there is a future restitution plan.

All the sentencing conditions shown in the record, including arguments, should be considered.