All judgment of the court below shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six years.

The applicant's compensation application is all filed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Fact-misunderstanding or misapprehension of the legal doctrine (Defendant 1) did not borrow from the victim R the sum of KRW 450 million in the first and second crimes No. 1 in the judgment of the first instance court, which was held in the first instance court related to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), and the Defendant merely received from the victim R the sum of KRW 120 million in return for the murder request against BK, which is a woman's misunderstanding.

B) The Defendant: (i) received KRW 880,360,000 from T Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “T”) operated by the victimized person to the account of C Co., Ltd. V (hereinafter “V”); (ii) the said money transferred by the injured person via T is all investment funds; and (iii) the victim actually operated V.

Shebly, even if the above money was borrowed, the Defendant used the money borrowed from the injured party for the purpose of the operation and acceptance of the shopping mall and did not deceiving the use of the borrowed money.

2) The Defendant related to the forgery of a private document and the uttering of a falsified document, only prepared a document with the authority delegated by each document titleholder to prepare it, and did not forge the document.

3) A theft Defendant received a certificate of a seal imprint from H on February 2, 2012 and changed the registration of a singing room in H’s name by using it, and did not steal H’s certificate of a seal imprint or certificate of a seal imprint.

4) 사기 관련 ㈎ 피고인은 피해자 H과 함께 노래방을 동업하여 운영하기로 하고 4회에 걸쳐 6,980만 원의 투자금을 받았을 뿐, H을 기망한 사실이 없고, 편취 범의도 없었다.

㈏ 피고인이 피해자 K으로부터 1억 원을 편취한 사실은 있으나, 제 2 원 심 판시와 같이 위조한 임대차 계약서를 이용하여 위 피해자를 기망하지 않았다.

㈐ 피해자 M에 대한 사기와 관련하여, 피고인은 M으로부터 2007. 10. 중순 마지막으로...