beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following determination as to the assertion that the defendant has repeatedly asserted or added in the trial, and thus, this case is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion
A. The Defendant asserts that a set-off or deduction claim amounting to KRW 13,729,50 is against the Plaintiff’s claim amounting to KRW 13,729,50 on February 28, 2018. 2) The Defendant asserted that a set-off claim was offset against the Plaintiff’s claim amounting to KRW 13,729,50 on the basis of the Plaintiff’s claim amount. 3,69,000 on February 28, 2018. 2) In full view of the health and evidence evidence evidence evidence evidence No. 16, the Defendant sent to the Plaintiff on February 5, 2018, KRW 13,729,50 on KRW 13,748,50 (ini 2,348,500, PC3,696,000, ES1,485, GSA70, 000, MO600, 2000, 2008.
“The fact that the Defendant sent the e-mail,” and it was found that the Defendant carried out offset of KRW 13,729,500 on the Customer Director (the details of the unpaid amount) prepared by the Defendant on October 10, 2018 at the closing date. However, the Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant unilaterally issued a tax invoice as if the Plaintiff leased the equipment rental fee, which was leased to the Non-Party Hospital, to the Non-Party Hospital, as if the Plaintiff leased the equipment from the Defendant, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise. The facts of recognition as seen earlier are insufficient to deem that the Defendant had the above claim against the Plaintiff.
Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.
B. The Defendant asserts that KRW 15,951,400 was paid to the Plaintiff, 15,951,400, in addition to KRW 867,823,924, which the Plaintiff deemed to have received from the Defendant, the Plaintiff paid KRW 15,951,400 in total to December 30, 2015 and January 25, 2017.