logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2016.02.03 2014가단38639
사용료
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay 8,5150,000 won to the Plaintiff and 15% per annum from September 10, 2015 to the date of complete payment.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. Fact 1) The Plaintiff (C) on July 2, 2014 (the representative director E, auditor F (E’s spouse), and the Plaintiff (hereinafter “D”) are Co., Ltd. D (the actual operator as E’s spouse);

[2) The period of use of earth and sand construction among H main complex construction works in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government: From June 17, 2014 to June 17, 2014, the Plaintiff leased the said ceiling air equipment, etc. at the above site from June 17, 2014 to August 16, 2014.

E and F performed the said Saturdays under the name of D, but upon request for verification of qualifications, such as the license for civil engineering works of new and old construction corporations, a contractor, acquired the defendant who had the license for civil engineering works as of August 8, 2014, and carried out the said Saturdays under the name of the defendant.

[D] In the case of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, its location is Nos. I, 9, 310, and the composition of executive officers is the representative director E (F representative director on July 19, 2015, the same day of retirement), and the auditor F. In the case of the defendant, the location of executive officers is Nos. 1, 9, and 220, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, and the representative director E (the office of office of August 8, 2014) and the auditor F. 3) The plaintiff issued the tax invoice of June 30, 2014 (32,296,000 won) and the tax invoice of July 31, 2014 (69,206,500 won) (including the total amount of rent of KRW 102,200,500, and the total amount of rent of KRW 20,300,00 (including value-added tax) under the above contract).

(4) The Plaintiff decided to reduce the total rent to KRW 95,150,00 (including value-added tax) upon the Defendant’s request for the reduction of the rent at the end of August 2014 or at the beginning of September 2014. Accordingly, the tax invoice issued in D as of June 30, 2014, which cannot be revoked at the time of the cancellation of the tax invoice issued in D as of July 31, 2014, and then the Defendant future.

arrow