A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[2] On June 5, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Seoul Western District Court on the part of June 5, 2014, and completed the execution of the sentence at Daejeon Prison on September 16, 2015.

In addition, on March 15, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act (compact) in the Sungnam Support of the Suwon Friwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 11, 2017.

[criminal records] On December 25, 2016, at around 18:30 on December 25, 2016, the Defendant delivered and received Metetop 205 Ma (one Meteopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopic) to E (In light of various circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, such as the circumstance at the time of control and the process of carrying seizeds, the Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion cannot be accepted).

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each list of seizure and copies of seizure records;

1. Investigation report (a copy of the record, such as indictment of the E), investigation report (a report on the progress of trial against public E);

1. Previous records: The application of Acts and subordinate statutes reporting the results of inquiry, current status of personal confinement, previous records of disposition and results of confirmation;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Selection and Management of Narcotics, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense (the choice of imprisonment with prison labor);

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act for the treatment of concurrent crimes: (a) the reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 39(1) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. for which the judgment became final and conclusive; and (b) the defendant who has been punished several times, including the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the situation in which the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act is in concurrent crimes, and the situation in which the defendant committed the instant crime again during the period of repeated crimes.