logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.04.09 2013고단6238
자동차손해배상보장법위반
Text

Acquittal of the accused shall be acquitted.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No owner of a motor vehicle shall operate any motor vehicle on a road, which is not mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant:

1. From No. 21:12 on December 5, 2010, at the estimated 3 per centon of Geumsan:

2. On December 22, 2010, 13:39, between the roads of the UP and the head of the water source in the direction of the water source on the roads of the UP insane;

3. On March 31, 201, at around 17:47, the section 178 km along thewest Coastal Expressway:

4. On August 8, 2011, 22:17 around 22:17 in the direction of bottled in the YYYYYYYYYYYYYYY:

5. On August 22, 201, at around 00:22: 358 km from the 358 km border:

6. On January 26, 2012, around 16:55, 380.9km in Busan:

7. On February 1, 2012, around 13:42, in front of the Suwon-dong Juvenile Culture Center in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si:

8. On October 23, 2012, 07:20, at the downstream line 180.4km on the Honam Expressway around 07:20:

9. From around 14:08 on October 29, 2012, the Geumsan 3: (a) around 15:35 on January 13, 2013, in the vicinity of Samsung 221-1, Young-gu, Suwon-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-do on January 13, 2013; (b) around 22:46 on January 23, 2013, in the front distance of the film elementary bridge of Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and around 17:8 km on January 26, 2013; and (c) around 17:19 around 27:36:36 on February 13, 2013, the estimated local government operated a D car without purchasing each mandatory insurance policy.

2. According to the records of this case, on October 16, 2013, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 3 million as a violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act by the Suwon District Court on the above facts, etc., and it is evident that the above summary order became final and conclusive on January 7, 2014. Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute the time when a final and conclusive judgment has been rendered, and thus, the Defendant is acquitted pursuant to Article 326 subparagraph 1 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow