beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract with C (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the Defendant is the insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract with D vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).
B. Around 17:30 on February 22, 2019, the Defendant’s vehicle, who was in the middle of the Han River from Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu to North Korea, was in the middle of the Han River and was in the middle of the Han River from the Han River to the upper-do tunnel slope, and the Defendant’s vehicle was in the middle of the Han River from the parallel of Yongsan-gu to the upper-do road from the opposite direction of the road from the opposite direction of the road from the upper direction of the road. The Defendant’s vehicle followed the left side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle that
(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.
On February 28, 2019, the Plaintiff paid KRW 878,000 to the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle for repair costs related to the instant accident, based on the insurance contract for the Plaintiff’s vehicle.
(other than KRW 200,000). [Grounds for recognition] / [The fact that there is no dispute, each entry or video of Gap 1 through 10, Eul 1 through 4 (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings.
2. The allegations and judgment of the parties
A. The plaintiff argued by the parties that the driver of the defendant vehicle, while keeping the movement of the vehicle passing on the front side and the right side, caused the traffic accident of this case by collision of the plaintiff vehicle, which was normally straighted due to the negligence of the driver of the defendant vehicle, although the driver of the defendant vehicle should be able to see the movement of the vehicle in a safe state.
In regard to this, the defendant did not find the defendant's vehicle that the plaintiff's vehicle attempted to make an internship in order in the U.S. area while trying to change the vehicle from the second line to the first line due to the preceding cargo vehicle. The defendant asserts that the accident in this case occurred entirely due to the negligence of the driver of the plaintiff's vehicle as above.
(b) judgment;