A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 6, 2018, from around 22:05 to 22:15, the Defendant: (a) received a 112 report from the original week B from around 22:05 to from around 22:12, that the customer was aware of his/her accounting under the influence of alcohol; (b) the background leading up to the Kuju Police Station C District Unit of the original state police station, and (c) the background leading up to E, who was able to use home, and (d) how he/she was able to use home, and (d) entered the main place; and (d) when he/she prevented the Defendant, the Defendant expressed his/her desire to “I Y, Chewing, how I w w w w w h h h h h h h, and h h h h h h h h

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reports and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to arrest and report cases;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment for one month to five years;

2. Scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of type] of the obstruction of performance of official duties or coercion of duties (special sponsers): Where the degree of violence, intimidation and deception is minor (the scope of the recommended area and the recommended punishment): Reduction area, one month to eight months of imprisonment.

3. Determination of sentence: Imprisonment with prison labor for four months and one year of suspended sentence; and