logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.01.28 2015고정501
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 30, 2013, while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.084% in blood, the Defendant driven approximately 300 meters in front of the road 518-2 meters prior to the 518-2-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on the driving of drinking and the statement in the circumstances of the driver;

1. The driver's license ledger (A);

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 3 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 154 subparagraph 2 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) of the relevant Act;

1. Punishment provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (Punishment provided for in a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act with heavier punishment);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In light of the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the gravity of non-licensed driving crimes, the defendant's criminal records, and other various sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment and circumstances, and balance with sentencing cases in the same and similar cases, the amount of fine specified in the summary order is not deemed excessive, and there is no change of circumstances that may be considered in sentencing after the summary order, and thus, it is so decided as per Disposition by maintaining the amount of fine in the summary order.

arrow