1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 57,062,587 with respect to the Plaintiff and the period from June 24, 2013 to November 26, 2015.

1. The fact of recognition was that the Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Treatment Construction”) contracted from the Korea Rail Network Authority for “The 3-1 Section Construction and other construction works for the Seoul High Speed (SP)” and subcontracted the “B” (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction works”) during the construction period from May 25, 2012 to December 20, 2014, when the rehabilitation procedure was commenced on December 30, 2013 at the Seoul Central District Court 2013Kahap275, which had been pending in the instant lawsuit, and the rehabilitation procedure was abolished on March 7, 2014; hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Good Assistance Construction”).

Upon the request of Defendant Awre Construction, the Plaintiff operated D 24 tons dump trucks in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, from March 2013 to run the construction site of this case, and carried them out to the outside of the construction site of this case by placing the stones generated from the blasting work of underground tunnel construction, which is one’s own. The Plaintiff driven the truck and moved the said truck to the underground construction site below about 53 meters for a vehicle set up in the vertical section and moved the stones generated from blasting work to the underground construction site below 53 meters, while driving the truck.

On the other hand, the aforementioned lifts operated a CCTV screen that enables the off-line driver to verify the existence of the off-line vehicle and operated the off-line and underground construction site as a result of the operation of the off-line. On the other hand, the off-line driver operated the off-line and underground construction site in a state where the off-line safety door is not closed for the safety of safety.

On June 24, 2013, at around 23:00, the Plaintiff driven the above truck and moved it to an underground construction site after boarding the set, and while leaving the set, Defendant E-ray Construction Co., Ltd., a lifts driver, did not properly look at the CCTV screen.