logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2018.08.09 2018고단651
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On January 27, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry in the Changwon District Court Msan Branch, and completed the execution of the sentence on November 4, 2015.

1. On March 10, 2016, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act, at the Changwon District Court's Busan District Court's Support on March 10, 2016. On July 13, 2017, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 4 million for the same crime by the same court.

Although the Defendant had been punished for driving under drinking more than two times, on February 25, 2018, the Defendant driven a F e-mail car at approximately 500 meters in front of the E-distance on the road in front of the oil station located in the Chang-si Member C, Chang-si, Chang-si, without obtaining a driver’s license around 03:40 on February 25, 2018, while under the influence of 0.072% of alcohol during blood.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice, was driving a motor vehicle without a driver’s license under the influence of alcohol.

2. When the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act was found to have driven under drinking at the time and place stated in paragraph 1, the Defendant stated the Defendant’s resident registration number, who was the Defendant’s usual going to the outside of the country, and went to the said G as he was the said G when he was aware of the fact that he was unable to pay a fine or his driver’s license was revoked, and that he was driving under a license without a license.

Accordingly, the defendant used another person's resident registration number unlawfully.

3. At the time and place specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) entered the “Ambre’s circumstantial statement report to the driver’s signature” prepared by the police officer I, who was a control police officer; (b) the Defendant: (c) entered the “Ambre’s column” in the “Ambre.”

Accordingly, the defendant forged his signature in the name of G for the purpose of exercising his right.

4. The defendant at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) shall be set forth in paragraph (3).

arrow