logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.03.08 2018가단5112973
보증채무금
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to Defendant C and Appointed F, each of the KRW 87,778,208 and KRW 21,313,990.

Reasons

1. Indication of claims: To describe the cause of claims and the changed cause of claims as shown in attached Form;

(However, the “creditor” is deemed to be the “Plaintiff”, and the “debtor” is deemed to be the “Defendant”. 2. The Defendant (Appointed Party) and the “Appointed Party”) rendered a confession judgment (Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act), Defendant C (Appointed Party) and the “Selection Party F did not dispute the existence or scope of the Plaintiff’s claim against the Plaintiff’s network D, and only the protest against the qualified acceptance. The Plaintiff accepted the defense and modified the purport of the claim, and did not dispute the Plaintiff’s changed claim without attending the date of pleading.

3. Claim against Defendant E: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).

arrow