Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. A defendant who violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from dangerous driving) was driving a car around 22:00 on November 2, 2016, and came to turn to the left at three-lanes of the three-lanes between the hills of the Seoul Gangnam-gu and the hills of the road in front of the Gangnam-gu Seoul, in the direction of the road at the scam shooting distance.

At the time, the defendant was placed on a large level, the walking condition was cut off, and the walking condition was cut off, and the driver did not carefully look at the steering and steering side of the vehicle and the steering system of the vehicle and the steering system of the vehicle are not operated accurately, so the defendant was placed in the front part of the victim E(65 years old) driving for passengers getting off at a three-lane, and received the front part of the above SM5 vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant, while driving a motor vehicle in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of alcohol, caused the injury of the victim G (V, 33 years old) who is the passenger of the said taxi to the throst of the string, and the injury of the string, etc., which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment to the victim H (V, 44 years old) who is the passenger of the said taxi, and caused the injury of the string and the tension of the string that requires four weeks of medical treatment.

2. On November 22, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of drinking measurement) on and around November 22, 2016, at the Gangnam-gu Police Station located in Samsung-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, indicated the Defendant as “Hgh” the police reduction level of drinking immediately after the accident as described in the preceding paragraph, and the Defendant’s speech and behavior state at the time are often attached, the walking state was defluent, and the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the time of driving as described in the preceding paragraph, such as where he/she was under the influence of alcohol as described in the preceding paragraph.

A police officer is required to take a breath test on three occasions due to reasonable grounds to determine a person, but the police officer refused to take a breath test without justifiable grounds and did not comply with the test.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;