logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.06.03 2013나5697
하자보수보증금 등
Text

1. The judgment of the first instance, including the Plaintiff’s claim expanded or added in the trial, shall be modified as follows:

Reasons

1. The reasoning for this Court’s explanation concerning this part of the underlying facts is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases. Thus, this Court shall accept it pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Attached 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance, “The details of each annual item of defects” is as shown in Attached 1. As shown in Attached 2, the list of apartment bonds transfer households and the list of sections for exclusive use and the list of repair expenses for defects as shown in Attached 2. of this judgment, and the overall list of repair expenses for defects in Attached 2.5.

The 1.2nd 2nd 2nd 3th 5th 1st 2th 2th 3th 3th 4th 2th 4th 2th 2th 3th 3th 4th 2th 3th 4th 4th 2th 3th 4th 2th 4th 2th 4th 2th 4th 1,643th 1,875,8031 1,875,219,658 21,810th 118,098,765th 71,2336 21,342,957- 16,439-21,592,762nd 167th 30,407th 1,643th 201, 206th 216th 263th 4th 201th 2th 3th appraisal.

2. Whether the case constitutes a defect;

A. As a result of the fact-finding appraiser's defect in comparison with the project approval drawings, the fact-finding appraiser of the case mentioned in the separate sheet No. 4 was constructed as a result of comparison with the project approval drawings, i.e., the project approval drawings, but deemed a defect different from the project approval drawings

However, the seller's default liability or warranty liability in the apartment sale contract is the party concerned.

arrow